Free PDF ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam–Efficient Latest Dumps Questions

Category: Blog

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Dumps Questions, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Dumps, Practice ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam, Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials, Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Vce Dumps

What's more, part of that 2Pass4sure ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cFw71wAlZd4Pc1crIJ2wB2TCZP2sIMso

Unfortunately, many candidates do not pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam because they rely on outdated PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation material. Failure leads to anxiety and money loss. You can avoid this situation with 2Pass4sure that provides you with the most reliable and actual PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor with their real answers for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation.

PECB is a leading provider of professional certifications in the field of information security management. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam is one of the most widely recognized certifications in the industry. It is designed to provide professionals with the knowledge and skills needed to effectively audit and assess an organization's ISMS to ensure compliance with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Dumps Questions <<

Outstanding ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Brain Dumps: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam supply you high-quality Practice Materials - 2Pass4sure

There are great and plenty benefits after the clients pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor test. Because the knowledge that our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam practice materials provides is conducive to enhancing the client' practical working abilities and stocks of knowledge, the clients will be easier to increase their wages and be promoted by their boss. Besides, they will be respected by their colleagues, friends and family members and be recognized as the elites among the industry. They will acquire more access to work abroad for further studies. So the clients must appreciate our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study question after they pass the test.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is a rigorous and comprehensive assessment of a candidate's knowledge and skills in leading an ISMS audit team and conducting an audit according to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 standard. It is a valuable certification for professionals who wish to advance their careers in information security management and auditing and demonstrate their expertise in the field.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q254-Q259):

NEW QUESTION # 254
Which one of the following statements best describes the purpose of conducting a document review?

  • A. To reveal whether the documented management system is nonconforming with audit criteria and to gather evidence to support the audit report
  • B. To determine the conformity of the management system, as far as documented, with audit criteria and to gather information to support the on-site audit activities
  • C. To decide about the conformity of the documented management system with audit standards and to gather findings to support the audit process
  • D. To detect any nonconformity of the management system, if documented, with audit criteria and to identify information to support the audit plan

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
A document review is a process of examining the documented information related to the management system before the on-site audit activities. The purpose of a document review is to: 12 Determine the conformity of the management system, as far as documented, with audit criteria, i.e., to check whether the documents are consistent, complete, and compliant with the requirements of ISO/IEC
27001 and any other applicable standards or regulations.
Gather information to support the on-site audit activities, i.e., to identify the scope, objectives, processes, controls, risks, and opportunities of the management system, and to plan the audit methods, techniques, and resources accordingly.
The other statements are not accurate, because:
A document review does not reveal or decide about the conformity or nonconformity of the management system as a whole, but only of the documented information. The conformity or nonconformity of the management system is determined by the on-site audit activities, which include interviews, observations, and tests12 A document review does not gather evidence or findings to support the audit report or process, but information to support the on-site audit activities. The evidence or findings are collected during the on-site audit activities, which are then documented and reported12 A document review does not detect any nonconformity of the management system, if documented, but determines the conformity of the documented information. The nonconformity of the management system is detected by the on-site audit activities, which evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the management system12 A document review does not identify information to support the audit plan, but gathers information to support the on-site audit activities. The audit plan is prepared before the document review, based on the audit scope, objectives, criteria, and program. The document review is part of the audit plan implementation12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2


NEW QUESTION # 255
You are an ISMS audit team leader tasked with conducting a follow-up audit at a client's data centre. Following two days on-site you conclude that of the original 12 minor and 1 major nonconformities that prompted the follow-up audit, only 1 minor nonconformity still remains outstanding.
Select four options for the actions you could take.

  • A. Book another follow-up audit on-site to review the one outstanding minor nonconformity once it has been cleared
  • B. Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified
  • C. Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised
  • D. Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit
  • E. Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity
  • F. Note the progress made but hold the audit open until all corrective action has been cleared
  • G. Advise the auditee that you will arrange an online audit to deal with the outstanding nonconformity
  • H. Recommend suspension of the organisation's certification as they have failed to implement the agreed corrections and corrective actions within the agreed timescale

Answer: B,C,D,E

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 requires the audit team leader to conduct a follow-up audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee in response to the nonconformities identified during a previous audit1. The follow-up audit should be conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and should result in a conclusion on the status of the nonconformities and any remaining issues1. Therefore, when conducting a follow-up audit, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has cleared most of the nonconformities, including the major one, and only one minor nonconformity remains outstanding. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. Therefore, this finding does not prevent or preclude the continuation of certification, as long as it is addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit, which is a regular audit conducted by the certification body to confirm the ongoing conformity and effectiveness of an ISMS3.
Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has demonstrated commitment and capability to implement corrective actions for the nonconformities identified during the previous audit. The auditor should agree with the auditee/audit client on a realistic, achievable, and effective corrective action plan for the remaining nonconformity, including a clear deadline and verification method. The auditor should also document this agreement in the follow-up audit report1.
Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to conducting and reporting the follow-up audit. The auditor should advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity, such as recommending its closure at the next surveillance audit or agreeing on a corrective action plan with the auditee/audit client. The auditor should also provide sufficient information and evidence to support their decision1.
Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the organisation has achieved satisfactory results in the follow-up audit. The auditor should close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised by implementing effective corrective actions for most of them and agreeing on a plan for the remaining one. The auditor should also communicate the follow-up audit conclusion to the auditee/audit client and other relevant parties1.


NEW QUESTION # 256
Stages of Information

  • A. creation, evolution, maintenance, use, disposition
  • B. creation, distribution, use, maintenance, disposition
  • C. creation, distribution, maintenance, disposition, use
  • D. creation, use, disposition, maintenance, evolution

Answer: B

Explanation:
The stages of information are creation, distribution, use, maintenance, and disposition. These are the phases that information goes through during its lifecycle, from the moment it is generated to the moment it is destroyed or archived. Each stage of information has different security requirements and risks, and should be managed accordingly. Creation, evolution, maintenance, use, and disposition are not the correct stages of information, as evolution is not a distinct stage, but a process that can occur in any stage. Creation, use, disposition, maintenance, and evolution are not the correct stages of information, as they are not in the right order. Creation, distribution, maintenance, disposition, and use are not the correct stages of information, as they are not in the right order. Reference: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 32. : [ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB], page 12.


NEW QUESTION # 257
You are the audit team leader conducting a third-party audit of an online insurance organisation. During Stage
1, you found that the organisation took a very cautious risk approach and included all the information security controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Appendix A in their Statement of Applicability.
During the Stage 2 audit, your audit team found that there was no evidence of the implementation of the three controls (5.3 Segregation of duties, 6.1 Screening, 7.12 Cabling security) shown in the extract from the Statement of Applicability. No risk treatment plan was found.

Select three options for the actions you would expect the auditee to take in response to a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.

  • A. Remove the three controls from the Statement of Applicability.
  • B. Undertake a survey of customers to find out if the controls are needed by them.
  • C. Revise the relevant content in the Statement of Applicability to justify their exclusion.
  • D. Allocate responsibility for producing evidence to prove to auditors that the controls are implemented.
  • E. Implement the appropriate risk treatment for each of the applicable controls.
  • F. Revisit the risk assessment process relating to the three controls.
  • G. Incorporate written procedures for the controls into the organisation's Security Manual.
  • H. Compile plans for the periodic assessment of the risks associated with the controls.

Answer: C,E,F

Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, the auditee should take the following actions in response to a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO/IEC 27001:20221:
* Implement the appropriate risk treatment for each of the applicable controls, as this is the main requirement of clause 6.1.3.e and the objective of the risk treatment process2.
* Revise the relevant content in the Statement of Applicability to justify their exclusion, as this is the expected output of the risk treatment process and the evidence of the risk-based decisions3.
* Revisit the risk assessment process relating to the three controls, as this is the input for the risk treatment process and the source of identifying the risks and the controls4.
The other options are not correct because:
* Allocating responsibility for producing evidence to prove to auditors that the controls are implemented is not a valid action, as the audit team already found that there was no evidence of the implementation of the three controls.
* Compiling plans for the periodic assessment of the risks associated with the controls is not a valid action, as this is part of the risk monitoring and review process, not the risk treatment process5.
* Incorporating written procedures for the controls into the organisation's Security Manual is not a valid action, as this is part of the documentation and operation of the ISMS, not the risk treatment process.
* Removing the three controls from the Statement of Applicability is not a valid action, as this is not a sufficient justification for their exclusion and does not reflect the risk treatment process.
* Undertaking a survey of customers to find out if the controls are needed by them is not a valid action, as this is not a relevant criterion for the risk assessment and treatment process, which should be based on the organisation's own context and objectives.
References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 36, section 4.5.22:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.e3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.f4: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause
6.1.25: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.2. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.5 and 8. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.d. : ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 4.1 and 4.2.


NEW QUESTION # 258
You are an ISMS audit team leader preparing to chair a closing meeting following a third-party surveillance audit. You are drafting a closing meeting agenda setting out the topics you wish to discuss with your auditee.
Which one of the following would be appropriate for inclusion?

  • A. A disclaimer that the result of the audit is based on the sampling of evidence
  • B. An explanation of the audit plan and its purpose
  • C. Names of auditees associated with nonconformities
  • D. A detailed explanation of the certification body's complaints process

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
This option is appropriate for inclusion in the closing meeting agenda, as it is a requirement of the ISO 19011 standard, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, including ISMS12. The standard states that the audit team leader should advise the auditee of any situations encountered during the audit that may decrease the confidence that can be placed in the audit conclusions, such as limitations in the audit scope, access, or sampling3. The standard also states that the audit report should include a statement that the audit is based on a sample of the information available at the time of the audit, and that the audit does not provide absolute assurance of the conformity or effectiveness of the audited management system4. Therefore, the audit team leader should include a disclaimer in the closing meeting agenda to inform the auditee of the nature and limitations of the audit, and to avoid any misunderstandings or false expectations. The other options are not appropriate for inclusion in the closing meeting agenda, as they are either irrelevant, incorrect, or incomplete.
For example:
*A detailed explanation of the certification body's complaints process is not relevant for the closing meeting agenda, as it is not related to the audit findings or conclusions. The certification body's complaints process should be communicated to the auditee before the audit, as part of the audit agreement or contract5.
*An explanation of the audit plan and its purpose is not correct for the closing meeting agenda, as it should have been done at the opening meeting or before the audit. The audit plan is a document that describes the scope, objectives, criteria, and methodology of the audit, as well as the audit schedule, the audit team, the audit locations, and the audit deliverables . The audit plan should be communicated and agreed with the auditee in advance, and any changes or deviations should be notified during the audit.
*Names of auditees associated with nonconformities are not complete for the closing meeting agenda, as they do not provide the details or the evidence of the nonconformities. The audit team leader should present the audit findings, which include the description, the audit criteria, and the audit evidence of each nonconformity, as well as the audit conclusions and the audit recommendation . The audit team leader should also avoid naming or blaming individuals, and focus on the processes and the system.
References: = 1: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 222: ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 13: ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.94: ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 7.5.25: ISO/IEC
17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, clause 9.8. : ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.1. : ISO/IEC 27007:2011 Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for information security management systems auditing, clause 6.2.1. : ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.2. : ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.10. : ISO/IEC 27007:2011 Information technology - Security techniques - Guidelines for information security management systems auditing, clause 6.3.3.


NEW QUESTION # 259
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Dumps: https://www.2pass4sure.com/ISO-27001/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-actual-exam-braindumps.html

BONUS!!! Download part of 2Pass4sure ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cFw71wAlZd4Pc1crIJ2wB2TCZP2sIMso

123456789101112131415

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *